As I read Matt Asay’s blog post this morning on the use of proprietary tools in the advocacy of open source ones, I recognize that my foray into the Mac world changed me quite a bit. Almost from day one using a Mac I was shelling out money to get an app. They were, mostly, well-made and not very expensive overall. But that was after years of being a Red Hat then SuSE Linux user and being sworn to the cause of open source. I think, as Matt says of Mark Antony, that I have become a pragmatist.
I’ve mentioned before that Linux users should be willing to pay for software- even proprietary, closed-source software- for Linux. One problem at a time is a good way to think of it. A better way is this: if people are willing to buy software for Linux, what will be the result? There will be more and more Linux software vendors. And if there are more vendors, Linux becomes a more viable option for those still on the fence.
I use and love Linux. All day in Linux, I’m programming using the Komodo IDE- a proprietary script editor built on top of the Mozilla codebase. I love that too, and I don’t see the conflict. Yesterday, I bought the codecs pack from Fluendo. I love that it’s available. That said, I use the GIMP and Inkscape for all my graphics needs- even at my day job I insist on that. The fact is that there are free or open source alternatives for just about anything you can think of. If the value proposition is there, I will pay for a tool. But with how advanced Linux is, paying for an operating system is galling. Why do people buy Windows®? Because it’s so good? No. They buy it because the apps they use run on Windows®. Buying Windows® has become merely a tax on using apps they are used to. How sad.
Let’s be pragmatic. Pick your battles. Let’s make Linux the priority.
Thanks for visiting! Any suggestions for content that would be helpful to you? Contact me.